On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 03:37:48PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > Add MAINTAINERS entry for TEE based Trusted Keys framework. > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 48aff80..eb3d889 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -9663,6 +9663,14 @@ F: include/keys/trusted-type.h > F: include/keys/trusted_tpm.h > F: security/keys/trusted-keys/ > > +KEYS-TRUSTED-TEE > +M: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@xxxxxxxxxx> > +L: linux-integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > +L: keyrings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > +S: Supported > +F: include/keys/trusted_tee.h > +F: security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tee.c > + > KEYS/KEYRINGS > M: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> > M: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > -- > 2.7.4 I'm sorry but I think I have changed my mind on this. This has been spinning for a while and sometimes conclusions change over the time. I don't think that we really need a separate subsystem tag. I'd be for a new M-entry or R-entry to the existing subsystem tag. It's essential to have ack from someone with ARM and TEE knowledge but this way too heavy for the purpose. I also see it the most manageable if the trusted keys PR's come from a single source. /Jarkko
