On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 10:26:41AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > In TPM 1.2 an authorization was a 20 byte number. The spec actually > recommended you to hash variable length passwords and use the sha1 > hash as the authorization. Because the spec doesn't require this > hashing, the current authorization for trusted keys is a 40 digit hex > number. For TPM 2.0 the spec allows the passing in of variable length > passwords and passphrases directly, so we should allow that in trusted > keys for ease of use. Update the 'blobauth' parameter to take this > into account, so we can now use plain text passwords for the keys. > > so before > > keyctl add trusted kmk "new 32 blobauth=f572d396fae9206628714fb2ce00f72e94f2258f" > > after we will accept both the old hex sha1 form as well as a new > directly supplied password: > > keyctl add trusted kmk "new 32 blobauth=hello keyhandle=81000001" > > Since a sha1 hex code must be exactly 40 bytes long and a direct > password must be 20 or less, we use the length as the discriminator > for which form is input. > > Note this is both and enhancement and a potential bug fix. The TPM > 2.0 spec requires us to strip leading zeros, meaning empyty > authorization is a zero length HMAC whereas we're currently passing in > 20 bytes of zeros. A lot of TPMs simply accept this as OK, but the > Microsoft TPM emulator rejects it with TPM_RC_BAD_AUTH, so this patch > makes the Microsoft TPM emulator work with trusted keys. > > Fixes: 0fe5480303a1 ("keys, trusted: seal/unseal with TPM 2.0 chips") > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I created a key: $ sudo ./tpm2-root-key 0x80000000 $ sudo ./tpm2-list-handles 0x80000000 $ keyctl add trusted kmk "new 32 blobauth=hello keyhandle=0x80000000" <keyctl usage> $ lsmod Module Size Used by sha1_generic 16384 2 trusted 32768 0 asn1_encoder 16384 1 trusted x86_pkg_temp_thermal 20480 0 iwlmvm 356352 0 iwlwifi 315392 1 iwlmvm tpm_crb 16384 0 tpm_tis 16384 0 tpm_tis_core 24576 1 tpm_tis tpm 61440 4 tpm_tis,trusted,tpm_crb,tpm_tis_core efivarfs 16384 1 What could be wrong? Have the full seris applied on a test kernel. The root key creation is contained in create_root_key(): https://github.com/jsakkine-intel/tpm2-scripts/blob/master/tpm2.py /Jarkko