On 8/7/20 7:15 AM, Petr Vorel wrote:
Hi all,
...
--- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_keys.sh
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_keys.sh
@@ -16,11 +16,14 @@ TST_NEEDS_DEVICE=1
# (450d0fd51564 - "IMA: Call workqueue functions to measure queued keys")
test1()
{
- local keyrings keycheck_lines keycheck_line templates test_file="file.txt"
+ local keyrings keycheck_lines keycheck_line templates
+ local policy="func=KEY_CHECK"
+ local test_file="file.txt"
tst_res TINFO "verifying key measurement for keyrings and templates specified in IMA policy file"
- keycheck_lines=$(require_ima_policy_content "func=KEY_CHECK" "")
+ require_ima_policy_content $policy
+ keycheck_lines=$(check_ima_policy_content $policy "")
keycheck_line=$(echo "$keycheck_lines" | grep "keyrings" | head -n1)
While working on this patchset, I wonder, why we don't check for
'func=KEY_CHECK.*keyrings' in single grep call instead of grepping it twice.
IMHO single grep call is enough. Or am I missing something?
Instead require_ima_policy_content calling "tst_brk" in error condition,
it can just return false and the caller can handle it as appropriate.
Would that avoid two grep calls?
thanks,
-lakshmi