Thanks for your advice, I have submitted a v2 patch.
Thanks,
Tianjia
On 2020/7/27 15:10, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:54 AM Tianjia Zhang
<tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Obviously, the TPM version number in the help message is wrong, which
will cause confusion. This patch fixes it.
How is this "obvious"? I tried finding the specification and could not
see anything
to back up TIS 1.3 being only supported with TPM 1.3, or the existence of a
TPM 1.3 specification at all.
Please consider that not everyone reading this patch description is deeply
familiar with the details and explain exactly what the mistake is.
Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In a bug fix, try to always add a 'FIxes' tag such as 'Fixes: 0edbfea537d1
("tpm/tpm_tis_spi: Add support for spi phy")', and Cc everyone that was
involved in the original patch that introduced a bug so they can Ack or
Nak it.
Arnd
drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig b/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig
index 58b4c573d176..8eedb3e704f3 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ config TCG_TIS_SPI
help
If you have a TPM security chip which is connected to a regular,
non-tcg SPI master (i.e. most embedded platforms) that is compliant with the
- TCG TIS 1.3 TPM specification (TPM1.2) or the TCG PTP FIFO
+ TCG TIS 1.3 TPM specification (TPM1.3) or the TCG PTP FIFO
specification (TPM2.0) say Yes and it will be accessible from
within Linux. To compile this driver as a module, choose M here;
the module will be called tpm_tis_spi.
--
2.17.1
