Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] ima: Have the LSM free its audit rule

Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] ima: Have the LSM free its audit rule
From: Nayna <nayna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 15:20:22 -0400
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@xxxxxxxxx>, James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>, "Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva02@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@xxxxxxxxx>, Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20200709061911.954326-2-tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0


On 7/9/20 2:19 AM, Tyler Hicks wrote:

Ask the LSM to free its audit rule rather than directly calling kfree().


Is it to be called audit rule or filter rule ?  Likewise in subject line.

Thanks & Regards,

    - Nayna

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] ima: Have the LSM free its audit rule
  - From: Tyler Hicks

References:
- [PATCH v3 00/12] ima: Fix rule parsing bugs and extend KEXEC_CMDLINE rule support
  - From: Tyler Hicks
- [PATCH v3 01/12] ima: Have the LSM free its audit rule
  - From: Tyler Hicks