On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 05:22:09PM -0700, Andrey Pronin wrote: > This patch prevents NULL dereferencing when using chip->ops while > sending TPM2_Shutdown command if both tpm_class_shutdown handler and > tpm_del_char_device are called during system shutdown. > > Both these handlers set chip->ops to NULL but don't check if it's > already NULL when they are called before using it. > > This issue was revealed in Chrome OS after a recent set of changes > to the unregister order for spi controllers, such as: > b4c6230bb0ba spi: Fix controller unregister order > f40913d2dca1 spi: pxa2xx: Fix controller unregister order > and similar for other controllers. I'm not sure I fully understand the scenario. When does thi happen? Why does not tpm_del_char_device need this? The changes listed tell me nothing. Why they have this effect? I'm just trying to understand whether this could be a regression or not. I neither understand what you mean by "and similar for other controllers." NAK for the reason that I don't understand what I'm merging. /Jarkko > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Pronin <apronin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c > index 8c77e88012e9..a410ca40a3c5 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c > @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ static int tpm_class_shutdown(struct device *dev) > struct tpm_chip *chip = container_of(dev, struct tpm_chip, dev); > > down_write(&chip->ops_sem); > - if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) { > + if (chip->ops && (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)) { > if (!tpm_chip_start(chip)) { > tpm2_shutdown(chip, TPM2_SU_CLEAR); > tpm_chip_stop(chip); > @@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ static void tpm_del_char_device(struct tpm_chip *chip) > > /* Make the driver uncallable. */ > down_write(&chip->ops_sem); > - if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) { > + if (chip->ops && (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)) { > if (!tpm_chip_start(chip)) { > tpm2_shutdown(chip, TPM2_SU_CLEAR); > tpm_chip_stop(chip); > -- > 2.25.1 >