Make broader use of ima_rule_contains_lsm_cond() to check if a given
rule contains an LSM conditional. This is a code cleanup and has no
user-facing change.
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
* v3
- No change
* v2
- No change
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 11 ++---------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index c4d0a0c1f896..81ee8fd1d83a 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -360,17 +360,10 @@ static bool ima_rule_contains_lsm_cond(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
static void ima_lsm_update_rules(void)
{
struct ima_rule_entry *entry, *e;
- int i, result, needs_update;
+ int result;
list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, e, &ima_policy_rules, list) {
- needs_update = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
- if (entry->lsm[i].args_p) {
- needs_update = 1;
- break;
- }
- }
- if (!needs_update)
+ if (!ima_rule_contains_lsm_cond(entry))
continue;
result = ima_lsm_update_rule(entry);
--
2.25.1
