Hello!
I want to enable IRQs now in QEMU's TPM TIS device model and I need to
work with the following patch to Linux TIS. I am wondering whether the
changes there look reasonable to you? Windows works with the QEMU
modifications as-is, so maybe it's a bug in the TIS code (which I had
not run into before).
The point of the loop I need to introduce in the interrupt handler is
that while the interrupt handler is running another interrupt may
occur/be posted that then does NOT cause the interrupt handler to be
invoked again but causes a stall, unless the loop is there.
The 'o' in the dmesg log indicates the original IRQ for which the
handler was invoked. The interrupt values have the following meaning.
0x2: STS valid
0x4: locality changed
0x80: command ready
So the first 'looping entry' [in log below] indicates that a locality
change interrupt occurred while the interrupt handler was running due to
STS_valid + command ready. This sounds reasonable considering that we
are frequently acquiring and releasing the locality. The loop then deals
with the locality change interrupt and the interrupts then settle.
[ 210.365129] tpm_tis MSFT0101:00: 2.0 TPM (device-id 0x1, rev-id 1)
[ 210.367124] looping: 0x4 (o: 0x82)
[ 212.375045] looping: 0x80 (o: 0x2)
[ 212.389218] looping: 0x4 (o: 0x82)
[ 212.404161] looping: 0x80 (o: 0x2)
[ 212.526427] looping: 0x4 (o: 0x82)
[ 212.595488] looping: 0x4 (o: 0x82)
[ 212.614357] looping: 0x80 (o: 0x2)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
index 65ab1b027949..f77544563fb1 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
@@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tis_int_handler(int dummy, void
*dev_id)
{
struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_id;
struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
- u32 interrupt;
+ u32 interrupt, o;
int i, rc;
rc = tpm_tis_read32(priv, TPM_INT_STATUS(priv->locality), &interrupt);
@@ -715,6 +715,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tis_int_handler(int dummy, void
*dev_id)
return IRQ_NONE;
priv->irq_tested = true;
+again:
if (interrupt & TPM_INTF_DATA_AVAIL_INT)
wake_up_interruptible(&priv->read_queue);
if (interrupt & TPM_INTF_LOCALITY_CHANGE_INT)
@@ -731,7 +732,12 @@ static irqreturn_t tis_int_handler(int dummy, void
*dev_id)
if (rc < 0)
return IRQ_NONE;
+ o = interrupt;
tpm_tis_read32(priv, TPM_INT_STATUS(priv->locality), &interrupt);
+ if (interrupt != 0) {
+ printk("looping: 0x%x (o: 0x%x)\n", interrupt, o);
+ goto again;
+ }
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -1062,6 +1068,8 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct
tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq,
goto out_err;
}
+ tpm_chip_start(chip);
+ chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ;
if (irq) {
tpm_tis_probe_irq_single(chip, intmask, IRQF_SHARED,
irq);
@@ -1074,6 +1082,7 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct
tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq,
} else {
tpm_tis_probe_irq(chip, intmask);
}
+ tpm_chip_stop(chip);
}
rc = tpm_chip_register(chip);
--
2.26.2
Stefan