On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 00:49, James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 10:42 +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 10:29, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> [...]
> > > > typedef struct
> > > > {
> > > > uint32_t timeLow;
> > > > uint16_t timeMid;
> > > > uint16_t timeHiAndVersion;
> > > > uint8_t clockSeqAndNode[8];
> > > > } TEE_UUID;
> > > >
> > > > (GlobalPlatform TEE Internal Core API spec v1.2.1 section 3.2.4)
> > > >
> > > > - The spec does not mandate any particular endianness and simply
> > > > warnsabout possible issues if secure and non-secure worlds differ
> > > > in endianness.
> > > > - OP-TEE uses %pUl assuming that host order is little endian
> > > > (that is true for the Arm platforms that run OP-TEE currently).
> > > > By the same logic %pUl should be fine in the kernel.
> >
> > I think Linux adheres to this RFC [1] for UUID byte order. See below
> > snippet from section: "Layout and Byte Order":
> >
> > The fields are encoded as 16 octets, with the sizes and order of
> > the
> > fields defined above, and with each field encoded with the Most
> > Significant Byte first (known as network byte order). Note that
> > the
> > field names, particularly for multiplexed fields, follow
> > historical
> > practice.
>
> Actually, that's not quite true. We used to support both little and
> big endian uuids until we realised it was basically microsoft vs
> everyone else (as codified by RFC 4122). Now we support UUIDs which
> are big endian and GUIDs which are little endian. This was the commit
> that sorted out the confusion:
>
> commit f9727a17db9bab71ddae91f74f11a8a2f9a0ece6
> Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Date: Wed May 17 10:02:48 2017 +0200
>
> uuid: rename uuid types
>
Thanks for providing the background here.
> so if you're using a little endian uuid, you should probably be using
> GUID for TEE_UUID.
IMO, using GUID in kernel for TEE_UUID in OP-TEE OS will lead to
deviation from GlobalPlatform TEE client spec [1] as the spec only
references it as UUID and we would like to keep kernel TEE client
interface to be compatible with GP specs.
[1] https://globalplatform.org/specs-library/tee-client-api-specification/
-Sumit
>
> James
>
