Re: [PATCH v10 2/8] oid_registry: Add TCG defined OIDS for TPM keys

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 10:14 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 05:25:40PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 14:42 -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > > On Tue Jun 16 20, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > The TCG has defined an OID prefix "2.23.133.10.1" for the
> > > > various
> > > > TPM
> > > > key uses.  We've defined three of the available numbers:
> > > > 
> > > > 2.23.133.10.1.3 TPM Loadable key.  This is an asymmetric key
> > > > (Usually
> > > > 		RSA2048 or Elliptic Curve) which can be
> > > > imported by a
> > > > 		TPM2_Load() operation.
> > > > 
> > > > 2.23.133.10.1.4 TPM Importable Key.  This is an asymmetric key
> > > > (Usually
> > > > 		RSA2048 or Elliptic Curve) which can be
> > > > imported by a
> > > > 		TPM2_Import() operation.
> > > > 
> > > > Both loadable and importable keys are specific to a given TPM,
> > > > the
> > > > difference is that a loadable key is wrapped with the symmetric
> > > > secret, so must have been created by the TPM itself.  An
> > > > importable
> > > > key is wrapped with a DH shared secret, and may be created
> > > > without
> > > > access to the TPM provided you know the public part of the
> > > > parent
> > > > key.
> > > > 
> > > > 2.23.133.10.1.5 TPM Sealed Data.  This is a set of data (up to
> > > > 128
> > > > 		bytes) which is sealed by the TPM.  It usually
> > > > 		represents a symmetric key and must be unsealed
> > > > before
> > > > 		use.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > James, which document are these defined in? I was searching last
> > > night, and couldn't find it.
> > 
> > It isn't.  It's defined in a TCG spreadsheet that Monty Wiseman
> > keeps, but that seems to be as "official" as it gets with the TCG
> > OID registry.
> > 
> > James
> 
> "The TCG has defined an OID prefix "2.23.133.10.1" for the various
> TPM key uses."
> 
> Should this sentence start just as "TCG ...", not sure if "the" is
> required?

I've always referred to it as The Trusted Computing Group (so the TCG)
partly to show they're not just any old trusted computing group.  But I
think they mostly do refer to themselves in literature as TCG.

James




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux