Re: [PATCH v6 8/8] ima: add FIRMWARE_PARTIAL_READ support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Scott,

On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 15:59 -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
> 
> @@ -648,6 +667,9 @@ int ima_post_read_file(struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size,
>  	enum ima_hooks func;
>  	u32 secid;
>  
> +	if (!file && read_id == READING_FIRMWARE_PARTIAL_READ)
> +		return 0;

The file should be measured on the pre security hook, not here on the
post security hook.  Here, whether "file" is defined or not, is
irrelevant.  The test should just check "read_id".

Have you tested measuring the firmware by booting a system with
"ima_policy=tcb" specified on the boot command line and compared the
measurement entry in the IMA measurement list with the file hash (eg.
sha1sum, sha256sum)?

Mimi

> +
>  	if (!file && read_id == READING_FIRMWARE) {
>  		if ((ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_FIRMWARE) &&
>  		    (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE)) {




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux