On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 13:28, Loïc Yhuel <loic.yhuel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Le jeu. 14 mai 2020 à 12:54, Jarkko Sakkinen > <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > So it is clear that "pr_warn(FW_BUG ..." would be a sane to have there. > So only to tell the UEFI might have logged events the kernel can't read ? > There is no warning if the table is missing, which would have the same result. > > I can try to dump it, perhaps it is using the SHA-1 log format. > If so, would a patch to support this non-standard behavior be accepted ? That is why I was asking the question: what exact condition should we warn about? And at which point?
