Re: Disparity in tpm pcr5 value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed May 06 20, Ken Goldman wrote:
On 5/5/2020 6:27 PM, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
On some systems we've had reports of the value of pcr5 doesn't match the digests in the tpm event log. It looks like I'm able to reproduce here with 5.7-rc4 on a dell system using this parser:

https://github.com/ValdikSS/binary_bios_measurements_parser

Any thoughts on where to start digging? Is there another tool I should use to parse this?

If you email me the event log in binary, I can run it through the IBM calculator and see if I get the same error.



A couple other data points:

- On the Dell system where I did this if I change it in the bios to use sha256
  instead of sha1, then using tsseventextend to parse matches the value in the tpm.
  In the sha256 case there is a final events log.

- I have a nuc5 here, which also extends into sha1, and the parse matches there.

- Javier has also reproduced it when passing through swtpm to a vm.

- I added some debugging code, and there is nothing extending pcr5 with tpm_pcr_extend.

- Ken's parse of the log also shows the disparity, which I've now done as well with
  the tpm1.2 version of the tsseventextend tool.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux