On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 07:35:42PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 10:43:18PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > static const char tpm_ibmvtpm_driver_name[] = "tpm_ibmvtpm";
> > >
> > > static const struct vio_device_id tpm_ibmvtpm_device_table[] = {
> > > @@ -147,6 +149,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
> > > {
> > > struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> > > int rc, sig;
> > > + bool retry = true;
> >
> > Cosmetic: would be nice to have inits when possible in reverse
> > Christmas tree order i.e.
> >
> > struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> > bool retry = true;
> > int rc, sig;
> >
> > It is way more pleasing for the eye when you have to read the source
> > code.
>
> I thought only netdev insisted on that :O
x86 seems to prefer too and I agree with the idea. But as I said only
that it would be nice.
/Jarkko
