On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 02:04:12PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > On 2/13/20 1:35 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 01:20:12PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > > > > > I don't want side effects for the TPM 1.2 case here, so I am only modifying > > > the flag for the case where the new TPM 2 is being used. Here's the code > > > where it shows the effect. > > I'm surprised this driver is using AUTO_STARTUP, it was intended for > > embedded cases where their is no firmware to boot the TPM. > > The TIS is also using it on any device. TIS is a generic driver, and can run on TPMs without firmware support. It doesn't know either way > > Chips using AUTO_STARTUP are basically useless for PCRs/etc. > > > > I'd expect somthing called vtpm to have been started and PCRs working > > before Linux is started?? > > Yes, there's supposed to be firmware. > > I only see one caller to tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl(chip), which is necessary to > call. This caller happens to be in tpm2_auto_startup. That seems to be a mistake, proper startup of the driver should never require auto_startup. Jason