Re: [PATCH] ima: Add a space after printing a LSM rule for readability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2020-01-03 at 15:51 +0800, clayc@xxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Clay Chang <clayc@xxxxxxx>

Normally this "From" line is only seen when the sender isn't the patch
author.  Any ideas what happened? 

> 
> When reading ima_policy from securityfs, there is a missing
> space between output string of LSM rules.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Clay Chang <clayc@xxxxxxx>

Good catch!  IMA policy rules based on LSM labels are used to
constrain which files are in policy.  Normally a single LSM label is
enough (e.g. dont_measure obj_type=auditd_log_t).  Could you include
in this patch description a use case where multiple LSM labels are
needed?

thanks,

Mimi

> ---
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> index ef8dfd47c7e3..1a266e4f99bc 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> @@ -1496,6 +1496,7 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>  					   (char *)entry->lsm[i].args_p);
>  				break;
>  			}
> +			seq_puts(m, " ");
>  		}
>  	}
>  	if (entry->template)




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux