Re: [PATCH v9 5/6] IMA: Add support to limit measuring keys

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/3/2019 12:06 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:

Suppose both root and uid 1000 define a keyring named "foo".  The
current "keyrings=foo" will measure all keys added to either keyring
named "foo".  There needs to be a way to limit measuring keys to a
particular keyring named "foo".

Mimi

Thanks for clarifying.

Suppose two different non-root users create keyring with the same name "foo" and, say, both are measured, how would we know which keyring measurement belongs to which user?

Wouldn't it be sufficient to include only keyrings created by "root" (UID value 0) in the key measurement? This will include all the builtin trusted keyrings (such as .builtin_trusted_keys, .secondary_trusted_keys, .ima, .evm, etc.).

What would be the use case for including keyrings created by non-root users in key measurement?

Also, since the UID for non-root users can be any integer value (greater than 0), can an an administrator craft a generic IMA policy that would be applicable to all clients in an enterprise?

thanks,
 -lakshmi





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux