On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 11:49:49AM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: > On Sat Nov 16 19, Stefan Berger wrote: > > On 11/14/19 11:44 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 06:41:51PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 03:27:25PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > > > > > From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > Move the setting of the TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ for irq probing into > > > > > tpm_tis_probe_irq_single before calling tpm_tis_gen_interrupt. > > > > > This move handles error conditions better that may arise if anything > > > > > before fails in tpm_tis_probe_irq_single. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Suggested-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > What about just changing the condition? > > > Also cannot take this since it is not a bug (no fixes tag). > > > > I'll repost but will wait until Jerry has tested it on that machine. > > > > Stefan > > > > > > > > > > /Jarkko > > > > > > It appears they still have the problem. I'm still waiting on logistics > to send me a system to debug. Which hardware is guaranteed to ignite this? I can try to get test hw for this from somewhere. Kind of looking into this blinded ATM. Dan? /Jarkko
