Re: [PATCH v8 2/5] IMA: Define an IMA hook to measure keys

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/20/2019 3:28 PM, Eric Snowberg wrote:
Hi Eric,


I’m interested in using this patch series, however I get the following on every boot:

[    1.222749] Call Trace:
[    1.223344]  ? crypto_destroy_tfm+0x5f/0xb0
[    1.224315]  ima_get_action+0x2c/0x30
[    1.225148]  process_buffer_measurement+0x1da/0x230
[    1.226306]  ima_post_key_create_or_update+0x3b/0x40

This is happening because IMA is not yet initialized when the IMA hook is called.

I had the following check in process_buffer_measurement() as part of my patch, but removed it since it is being upstreamed separately (by Mimi)

 if (!ima_policy_flag)
 	return;

Until this change is in, please add the above line locally on entry to process_buffer_measurement() to get around the issue.

thanks,
 -lakshmi



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux