On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:14:02PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 03:20:05PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 08:20:23PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > Also replicants for durations and timeouts files would make sense for > > > TPM 2.0. > > > > These ones don't meet the sysfs standard of one value per file, which > > is why they didn't make it to tpm2 > > They would be still useful to have available in some form as there is > no way deduce them from the user space. Why? Userspace doesn't refer to these values since the kernel handles all the timeouts, right? Jason
