On 10/13/19 11:34 AM, Nayna wrote:
Hi Lakshmi,
I am wondering that even though there is just one argument change in the
process_buffer_measurement() function, a full new function is defined.
This makes reviewing the function more difficult than it should be. Can
you please check on how the patch is getting formatted ?
Moreover, I am already modifying this function as part of the blacklist
patchset, but in a different way. Please refer to the Patch [5/8] in the
patchset titled "powerpc: Enabling IMA arch specific secure boot
policies". It was posted on 8th October.
I will modify the process_buffer_measurement() function in a way that
can work for both of our requirements and will post a new version soon.
Thanks & Regards,
- Nayna
Hi Nayna,
I think it is because I moved the function towards the top of the file -
so it appears like a delete and an add instead of a minor change :(
Please let me know when you send your change. I'll take a look.
thanks,
-lakshmi
