On Fri, 2019-10-04 at 09:37 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-10-03 at 21:51 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > As has been seen recently, binding the buffer allocation and tpm_buf
> > together is sometimes far from optimal.
>
> Can you elaborate on this a bit more? I must have missed the
> discussion.
Refer to e13cd21ffd50 ("tpm: Wrap the buffer from the caller to
tpm_buf in tpm_send()") for the details.
Mimi
