On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 07:29:43PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote: > This discussion is going around in circles. There are enough people > asking that the kernel provide at least the TPM version (eg. TPM 1.2 > or TPM 2.0). Userspace applications/regression tests shouldn't have > to figure out the TPM version by sending a TPM command and seeing if > it fails. That really isn't asking a lot. A single version number could be appropriate for sysfs > I would also prefer not having to be dependent on a userspace > application to read the TPM PCRs in order to verify the IMA > measurement list. Why? Jason
