Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: move common keyring handler functions to new file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(Cc'ing Josh Boyer, David Howells)

On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 21:55 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Nayna Jain <nayna@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > The handlers to add the keys to the .platform keyring and blacklisted
> > hashes to the .blacklist keyring is common for both the uefi and powerpc
> > mechanisms of loading the keys/hashes from the firmware.
> >
> > This patch moves the common code from load_uefi.c to keyring_handler.c
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> > ---
> >  security/integrity/Makefile                   |  3 +-
> >  .../platform_certs/keyring_handler.c          | 80 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../platform_certs/keyring_handler.h          | 32 ++++++++
> >  security/integrity/platform_certs/load_uefi.c | 67 +---------------
> >  4 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c
> >  create mode 100644 security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.h
> 
> This has no acks from security folks, though I'm not really clear on who
> maintains those files.

I upstreamed David's, Josh's, and Nayna's patches, so that's probably
me.

> Do I take it because it's mostly just code movement people are OK with
> it going in via the powerpc tree?

Yes, the only reason for splitting load_uefi.c is for powerpc.  These
patches should be upstreamed together.  

Mimi




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux