Quoting Jarkko Sakkinen (2019-08-21 12:11:31) > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:07:41AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Any name is fine for me. Any suggestions? > > What if just add @ready to struct tpm_tis_spi_phy add drop this patch > altogether? > > It is only used only by CR50 but I think it is less of an overkill than > adding a callback. > Ok, sounds good.
