On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 01:22:59PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > This patch-set is an outcome of discussion here [1]. It has evolved very > much since v1 to create, consolidate and generalize trusted keys > subsystem. > > This framework has been tested with trusted keys support provided via TEE > but I wasn't able to test it with a TPM device as I don't possess one. It > would be really helpful if others could test this patch-set using a TPM > device. I think 1/5-4/5 make up a non-RFC patch set that needs to reviewed, tested and merged as a separate entity. On the other hand 5/5 cannot be merged even if I fully agreed on the code change as without TEE patch it does not add any value for Linux. To straighten up thing I would suggest that the next patch set version would only consists of the first four patches and we meld them to the shape so that we can land them to the mainline. Then it should be way more easier to concentrate the actual problem you are trying to resolve. /Jarkko
