On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 15:07 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On some platforms, the TPM power is managed by firmware and therefore we
> don't need to stop the TPM on suspend when going to a light version of
> suspend such as S0ix ("freeze" suspend state). Add a chip flag to
> indicate this so that certain platforms can probe for the usage of this
> light suspend and avoid touching the TPM state across suspend/resume.
The commit message should mention the new constant.
> + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_FIRMWARE_POWER_MANAGED)
> + if (!pm_suspend_via_firmware())
Why both checks are needed?
If both checks are needed, you could write it as a single
conditional statement:
if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_FIRMWARE_POWER_MANAGED &&
!pm_suspend_via_firmware())
/Jarkko
