Hi Jarkko,
On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 18:11 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-07-06 at 20:18 -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * tpm_get_pcr_allocation() - initialize the chip allocated banks for PCRs
> > + * @chip: TPM chip to use.
> > + */
> > +static int tpm_get_pcr_allocation(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> > + rc = tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(chip);
> > + else
> > + rc = tpm1_get_pcr_allocation(chip);
> > +
> > + return rc;
> > +}
>
> It is just a trivial static function, which means that kdoc comment is
> not required and neither it is useful. Please remove that. I would
> rewrite the function like:
>
> static int tpm_get_pcr_allocation(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> {
> int rc;
>
> rc = (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) ?
> tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(chip) :
> tpm1_get_pcr_allocation(chip);
>
> return rc > 0 ? -ENODEV : rc;
> }
>
> This addresses the issue that Stefan also pointed out. You have to
> deal with the TPM error codes.
Hm, in the past I was told by Christoph not to use the ternary
operator. Have things changed? Other than removing the comment, the
only other difference is the return.
Mimi
