On Thu, 2019-06-27 at 16:17 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 19:56 -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > You've used so much on this so shouldn't this have that somewhat new > > > co-developed-by tag? I'm also wondering can this work at all > > > > Honestly, I've just been massaging this patch more than "authoring" it. > > If you feel strongly about it feel free to add a Co-authored patch with > > my name, but in my mind this is just Thiru's work. > > This is just my subjective view but writing code is easier than making > it work in the mainline in 99% of cases. If this patch was doing > something revolutional, lets say a new outstanding scheduling algorithm, > then I would think otherwise. It is not. You without question deserve > both credit and also the blame (if this breaks everything) :-) Not like I'm putting the pressure on this. You make the call with the tag. Put it if you wwant. I'm cool with either. /Jarkko
