On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 11:13:13AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Jarkko Sakkinen (2019-06-14 08:27:00)
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:09:24AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/tpm.h b/include/linux/tpm.h
> > > index 1b5436b213a2..48df005228d0 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/tpm.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/tpm.h
> > > @@ -132,6 +132,8 @@ struct tpm_chip {
> > > int dev_num; /* /dev/tpm# */
> > > unsigned long is_open; /* only one allowed */
> > >
> > > + unsigned long is_suspended;
> > > +
> > > char hwrng_name[64];
> > > struct hwrng hwrng;
> >
> > I think it would better idea to have a bitmask of some sort that
> > would have bits for 'open' and 'suspended'.
> >
>
> Sure. I can combine is_open and is_suspended into some sort of 'unsigned
> long flags' member and then have #define TPM_IS_OPEN 0 and #define
> TPM_IS_SUSPENDED 1 defines?
Sounds sustainable.
/Jarkko
