On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 9:28 AM Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Paul, /me waves > On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 10:44 +0300, Janne Karhunen wrote: > > Atomic policy updaters are not very useful as they cannot > > usually perform the policy updates on their own. Since it > > seems that there is no strict need for the atomicity, > > switch to the blocking variant. While doing so, rename > > the functions accordingly. > > > > Changelog v2 > > - Rebase to 'next-queued-testing' > > > > Signed-off-by: Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@xxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The patches need to be upstreamed together. Do you have any problems > with my upstreaming them via linux-integrity? Nope, I've been operating under the assumption that you would be taking both patches via the linux-integrity tree. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com
