On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 12:48 AM James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > simple fact that we started with one type of notifier for the LSM, and > > we are now switching to the other (and getting lucky that it is safe > > to do so for the existing callers) seems to lend some weight to the > > argument we may need both and adding "block"/"blocking"/etc. to the > > name has value. > > Fair enough. Ok, I take this to mean we have an agreement to go with this variant. I will post the fixes to the Mimi's findings on top of this one tomorrow. -- Janne
