Kernel booted just with ima_policy=tcb (not with
ima_policy=appraise_tcb) shouldn't require signed policy.
Regression found with LTP test ima_policy.sh.
Fixes: c52657d93b05 ("ima: refactor ima_init_policy()")
Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@xxxxxxx>
---
Changelog v1->v2:
* Use POLICY_CHECK instead of ima_use_appraise_tcb.
Thanks Mimi for obvious hint :).
Kind regards,
Petr
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index e0cc323f948f..0f6fe53cef09 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -498,10 +498,11 @@ static void add_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *entries, int count,
list_add_tail(&entry->list, &ima_policy_rules);
}
- if (entries[i].action == APPRAISE)
+ if (entries[i].action == APPRAISE) {
temp_ima_appraise |= ima_appraise_flag(entries[i].func);
- if (entries[i].func == POLICY_CHECK)
- temp_ima_appraise |= IMA_APPRAISE_POLICY;
+ if (entries[i].func == POLICY_CHECK)
+ temp_ima_appraise |= IMA_APPRAISE_POLICY;
+ }
}
}
--
2.16.4
