> > The question is whether this impacts your current set of patches? We > > really need to take this discussion back to the mailing list. I've > > responded to my original post with this info. > > Hmm, if we add the iversion query as you suggested the function can be > added as a polling point just about anywhere. I added it in there now. That said, before I chop that patch into pieces with individual explanations (and fix the few remaining bugs that seemed to have slipped in), hope you can let me know beforehand if the concept is ok from your point of view. I understand it fully if this is too intrusive as it goes all over the place. Just something we had to do to keep the system rolling. -- Janne
