Re: Regression in suspend-to-ram (TPM related) with 5.1-rc1 (BISECTED)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21.03.19 14:41, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 04:03:37PM -0700, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
>> So I bisected this down to:
>>
>> # first bad commit: [a3fbfae82b4cb3ff9928e29f34c64d0507cad874] tpm:
>> take TPM chip power gating out of tpm_transmit()
>>
>> but this doesn't revert cleanly on Linus' HEAD. Anyone have an idea what
>> could be wrong here?
> 
> Sorry I've been in flu for the early week. I spotted the bug
> immediately.  When I did these patches I did not have TPM 1.x at my
> hand. I used fTPM 2.0 and dTPM 2.0. Stefan did TPM 1.x testing but I
> probably forgot to ask him to try out suspend.
> 
> Anyway, the bug is obvious and I'll send you a patch to try out.
> Thanks a lot for bisecting this!
> 
> /Jarkko
> 


Hi,

Any news on this? It seems not to be fixed in -rc4. I'd happily test a
patch too.

thanks a lot,

                            martin

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux