On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 2:11 PM Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We want to use the efivarfs for compatibility with existing userspace > tools. We will track and match any EFI changes that affect us. So you implement the full PK/KEK/db/dbx/dbt infrastructure, and updates are signed in the same way? > Our use case is restricted to secure boot - this is not going to be a > general purpose EFI variable implementation. In that case we might be better off with a generic interface for this purpose that we can expose on all platforms that implement a secure boot key hierarchy. Having an efivarfs that doesn't allow the creation of arbitrary attributes may break other existing userland expectations.
