On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 11:39 AM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 11:32:11AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > A "get random" may fail with a TPM error, but those codes were returned > > as-is to the caller, which assumed the result was the number of bytes > > that had been written to the target buffer, which could lead to an kernel > > heap memory exposure and over-read. > > > > This fixes tpm1_get_random() to mask positive TPM errors into -EIO, as > > before. > > > > [ 18.092103] tpm tpm0: A TPM error (379) occurred attempting get random > > [ 18.092106] usercopy: Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object 'kmalloc-64' (offset 0, size 379)! > > > > Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650989 > > Reported-by: Phil Baker <baker1tex@xxxxxxxxx> > > Reported-by: Craig Robson <craig@xxxxxxxxx> > > Fixes: 7aee9c52d7ac ("tpm: tpm1: rewrite tpm1_get_random() using tpm_buf structure") > > Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm1-cmd.c | 9 ++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm1-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm1-cmd.c > > index 85dcf2654d11..faeb78ecf960 100644 > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm1-cmd.c > > @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ struct tpm1_get_random_out { > > * > > * Return: > > * * number of bytes read > > - * * -errno or a TPM return code otherwise > > + * * -errno (positive TPM return codes are masked to -EIO) > > */ > > int tpm1_get_random(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *dest, size_t max) > > { > > @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ int tpm1_get_random(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *dest, size_t max) > > > > rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM_TAG_RQU_COMMAND, TPM_ORD_GET_RANDOM); > > if (rc) > > - return rc; > > + goto fail; > > ?? Does tpm_buf_init() return positive?? Shouldn't.. > > I think you actually want this: I didn't check that, but it was tpm_transmit_cmd() that was failing (and would be covered by the error path change I sent). > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm1-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm1-cmd.c > index 85dcf2654d1102..a01e6fba1aacb6 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm1-cmd.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm1-cmd.c > @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ struct tpm1_get_random_out { > * > * Return: > * * number of bytes read > - * * -errno or a TPM return code otherwise > + * * -errno > */ > int tpm1_get_random(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *dest, size_t max) > { > @@ -531,8 +531,10 @@ int tpm1_get_random(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *dest, size_t max) > > rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, &buf, sizeof(out->rng_data_len), > "attempting get random"); > - if (rc) > + if (rc) { > + rc = -EIO > goto out; > + } > > out = (struct tpm1_get_random_out *)&buf.data[TPM_HEADER_SIZE]; > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c > index e74c5b7b64bfbd..9fa498b4cf8816 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c > @@ -328,8 +328,10 @@ int tpm2_get_random(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *dest, size_t max) > offsetof(struct tpm2_get_random_out, > buffer), > "attempting get random"); > - if (err) > + if (err) { > + rc = -EIO; > goto out; > + } > > out = (struct tpm2_get_random_out *) > &buf.data[TPM_HEADER_SIZE]; Eeks, I missed tpm2. In both cases, though a negative error would be masked. I was trying to leave those as-is and only mask positive errors. -- Kees Cook