Re: [PATCH v4] tpm: fix an invalid condition in tpm_common_poll
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Subject
: Re: [PATCH v4] tpm: fix an invalid condition in tpm_common_poll
From
: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:34:18 -0700
Cc
: grawity@xxxxxxxxx, James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
20190328123428.GF7094@linux.intel.com
>
Openpgp
: preference=signencrypt
User-agent
: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
On 3/28/19 5:34 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >
Thank you, it is applied.
Thank you Jarkko. -- Tadeusz
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Follow-Ups
:
Re: [PATCH v4] tpm: fix an invalid condition in tpm_common_poll
From:
Thibaut Sautereau
References
:
[PATCH v4] tpm: fix an invalid condition in tpm_common_poll
From:
Tadeusz Struk
Re: [PATCH v4] tpm: fix an invalid condition in tpm_common_poll
From:
Jarkko Sakkinen
Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCH v4] tpm: fix an invalid condition in tpm_common_poll
Next by Date:
Re: Should mprotect(..., PROT_EXEC) be checked by IMA?
Previous by thread:
Re: [PATCH v4] tpm: fix an invalid condition in tpm_common_poll
Next by thread:
Re: [PATCH v4] tpm: fix an invalid condition in tpm_common_poll
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux Kernel Hardening]
[Linux NFS]
[Linux NILFS]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]