On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 11:23, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:21 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:15 PM Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Commit a893ea15d764 ("tpm: move tpm_chip definition to
> > > include/linux/tpm.h") introduced a build error when both ima and efi is
> > > enabled. What happens is that both headers (ima.h and efi.h) defines the
> > > same 'NONE' constant, and it broke when they started getting included
> > > from the same file.
> >
> > > We only need one of the two patches applied.
> >
> > I would argue that we need two patches applied. Namespace is a hidden
> > issue in the code.
> >
> > This patch looks good to me, FWIW,
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Oh, did you change ABI? So, I have to say that enum changes are okay,
> but ABI, if any, are not.
urgh, thank you for the review. It looks like I changed a bit too much
in ima_parse_rule() =/
I'll send send out a v2 shortly.
Cheers,
Anders
