> On Feb 11, 2019, at 11:10 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:09:25AM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote: >> It is just that I find the use of static_cpu_has()/boot_cpu_has() to be very >> inconsistent. I doubt that show_cpuinfo_misc(), copy_fpstate_to_sigframe(), >> or i915_memcpy_init_early() that use static_cpu_has() are any hotter than >> text_poke_early(). > > Would some beefing of the comment over it help? Is there any comment over static_cpu_has()? ;-) Anyhow, obviously a comment would be useful.
