Re: [PATCH v9 6/6] tpm: pass an array of tpm_extend_digest structures to tpm_pcr_extend()

[Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2/1/2019 8:15 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Roberto,
>
> Sorry for the delayed review.  A few comments inline below, minor
> suggestions.
>
> > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> > index cc12f3449a72..e6b2dcb0846a 100644
> > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> > @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ extern int ima_policy_flag;
> >   extern int ima_hash_algo;
> >   extern int ima_appraise;
> >   extern struct tpm_chip *ima_tpm_chip;
> > +extern struct tpm_digest *digests;
> >   
> >   /* IMA event related data */
> >   struct ima_event_data {
> > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
> > index 6bb42a9c5e47..296a965b11ef 100644
> > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
> > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
> > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> >   /* name for boot aggregate entry */
> >   static const char boot_aggregate_name[] = "boot_aggregate";
> >   struct tpm_chip *ima_tpm_chip;
> > +struct tpm_digest *digests;
>
> "digests" is used in the new ima_init_digests() and in
> ima_pcr_extend().  It's nice that the initialization routines are
> grouped together here in ima_init.c, but wouldn't it better to define
> "digests" in ima_queued.c, where it is currently being used?
>   "digests" could then be defined as static.

'digests' and ima_init_digests() can be moved to ima_queue.c, but I have
to add the definition of ima_init_digests() to ima.h. Should I do it?


> >   /* Add the boot aggregate to the IMA measurement list and extend
> >    * the PCR register.
> > @@ -104,6 +105,24 @@ void __init ima_load_x509(void)
> >   }
> >   #endif
> >   
> > +int __init ima_init_digests(void)
> > +{
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	if (!ima_tpm_chip)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	digests = kcalloc(ima_tpm_chip->nr_allocated_banks, sizeof(*digests),
> > +			  GFP_NOFS);
> > +	if (!digests)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ima_tpm_chip->nr_allocated_banks; i++)
> > +		digests[i].alg_id = ima_tpm_chip->allocated_banks[i].alg_id;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >   int __init ima_init(void)
> >   {
> >   	int rc;
> > @@ -125,6 +144,9 @@ int __init ima_init(void)
> >   
> >   	ima_load_kexec_buffer();
> >   
> > +	rc = ima_init_digests();
>
> Ok. Getting the tpm chip is at the beginning of this function.
>   Deferring allocating "digests" to here, avoids having to free memory
> on failure.
>
> ima_load_kexec_buffer() restores prior measurements, but doesn't
> extend the TPM.  For anyone reading the code, a short comment above
> ima_load_kexec_buffer() would make sense.

Ok. Should I resend the last patch again with the fixes you suggested?

Thanks

Roberto


> Mimi
>     
> > +	if (rc != 0)
> > +		return rc;
> >   	rc = ima_add_boot_aggregate();	/* boot aggregate must be first entry */
> >   	if (rc != 0)
> >   		return rc;
> > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
> > index 0e41dc1df1d4..719e88ca58f6 100644
> > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
> > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
> > @@ -140,11 +140,15 @@ unsigned long ima_get_binary_runtime_size(void)
> >   static int ima_pcr_extend(const u8 *hash, int pcr)
> >   {
> >   	int result = 0;
> > +	int i;
> >   
> >   	if (!ima_tpm_chip)
> >   		return result;
> >   
> > -	result = tpm_pcr_extend(ima_tpm_chip, pcr, hash);
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ima_tpm_chip->nr_allocated_banks; i++)
> > +		memcpy(digests[i].digest, hash, TPM_DIGEST_SIZE);
> > +
> > +	result = tpm_pcr_extend(ima_tpm_chip, pcr, digests);
> >   	if (result != 0)
> >   		pr_err("Error Communicating to TPM chip, result: %d\n", result);
> >   	return result;

--
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Bo PENG, Jian LI, Yanli SHI