Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] tpm: don't return bool from update_timeouts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 11:23:03PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 01:14:15PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > Set tpm_chip->timeouts_adjusted directly in the update_timeouts
> > code instead of returning bool. In case of tpm read failing
> > print warning that the read failed and continue on.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hey, can you-re-send this without RFC and the earlier that I already
applied to my tree, with CC to linux-kernel and linux-security-module?

Keep my reviewed-by in both.

Otherwise, I cannot include these into my next PR.

/Jarkko



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux