On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 07:09:48PM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
>
>
> On 12/5/2018 1:14 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 09:21:38AM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > > The new tpm_bank_list structure has been preferred to the tpm_digest
> > > structure, to let the caller specify the size of the digest (which may be
> > > unknown to the TPM driver).
> >
> > Why is that? Didn't previous commit query these?
> >
> > > +struct tpm_bank_list {
> > > + u16 alg_id;
> > > + u16 extend_size;
> > > + const u8 *extend_array;
> > > +};
> >
> > Naming is not good here. If this only for extending shouldn't that
> > be in the structs name?
>
> tpm_extend_input?
I think something like this would be appropriate:
struct tpm_extend_digest {
u16 alg_id;
u16 size;
u8 *data;
};
/Jarkko
