On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 10:31 +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> Use the aptly named function rather than open coding the check. No
> functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>
Thanks. This patch is now in the #next-integrity branch.
Mimi
> ---
> security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> index 1b88d58e1325..05fbf8a2fa42 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void ima_rdwr_violation_check(struct file *file,
> } else {
> if (must_measure)
> set_bit(IMA_MUST_MEASURE, &iint->atomic_flags);
> - if ((atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) > 0) && must_measure)
> + if (inode_is_open_for_write(inode) && must_measure)
> send_writers = true;
> }
>
