On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 15:31 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 15:40 -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 09:21:35AM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote: > > > Currently the TPM driver allows other kernel subsystems to read only the > > > SHA1 PCR bank. This patch modifies the parameters of tpm_pcr_read() and > > > tpm2_pcr_read() to pass a tpm_digest structure, which contains the desired > > > hash algorithm. Also, since commit 125a22105410 ("tpm: React correctly to > > > RC_TESTING from TPM 2.0 self tests") removed the call to tpm2_pcr_read(), > > > the new parameter is expected to be always not NULL. > > > > > > Due to the API change, IMA functions have been modified. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Acked-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Mimi, Nayna, can you help with testing this (because of the IMA change)? > > It's up & running and the measurement list verifies against the TPM > PCR. Although this system has two algorithms enabled, all of the PCRs > are allocated for one algorithm and none for the other. I'm still > looking around for another system with PCR 10 enabled for multiple > algorithms. PCRs for sha1 and sha256 algorithms are being updated and the measurement list verifies against the SHA1 PCR-10. Roberto, have you added support in ima-evm-utils to validate the other banks? Mimi