On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 02:01:47PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 10:47:19AM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > > Commit 1db15344f874 ("tpm: implement TPM 2.0 capability to get active
> > > PCR banks") defined active_banks[7]. Subsequently, commit
> > > 4d23cc323cdb ("tpm: add securityfs support for TPM 2.0 firmware event
> > > log") defined TPM2_PCR_ACTIVE_BANKS as 3. I'm not sure which is the
> > > correct value, but the number of active_banks should not be hard coded
> > > here.
> >
> > Jarkko, should I change the value of TPM2_PCR_ACTIVE_BANKS, or set the
> > size of the active_banks array to TPM2_PCR_ACTIVE_BANKS?
>
> Hi, sorry I missed your patch set. Please add me either to 'To' or 'Cc'
> field of the email if you want a quick response.
>
> I think the implementation is flakky in both places and should be fixed
> before doing any other changes. Thanks James for pointing out these
> commits.
>
> What you need to do is to create a prequel commit that reads the number
> of banks to a variable e.g.
>
> unsigned int nr_active_banks;
>
> and allocate 'active_banks' dynamically and change the places that
> James pointed out. I guess it is OK to have a commit with two 'Fixes'
> tags.
Oops sorry Roberto! I had already reviewed this version :-) Apologies.
/Jarkko
