On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 12:08:53PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > Yes, I wondered about this, but I don't understand the bus protocol > well enough. The tpm-interface:tpm_try_transmit() which throws the > first ETIME says after we get that we send chip->ops->cancel() which > tpm_tis simply translates to tpm_tis_ready() which also times out. Is > there a bigger hammer I can hit it with? tpm_tis_ready() gets called twice and it is unsynced (no wait). Maybe this confuses the chip somehow? /Jarkko
