On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 04:45:47PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > On 06/22/2018 04:43 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > >On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 12:46:11PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > >>Implement tpm_chip_find() for other subsystems to find a TPM chip and > >>get a reference to that chip. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> include/linux/tpm.h | 5 +++++ > >> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+) > >> > >>diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c > >>index 4e83695af068..2520555b1e17 100644 > >>+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c > >>@@ -81,6 +81,33 @@ void tpm_put_ops(struct tpm_chip *chip) > >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_put_ops); > >> /** > >>+ * tpm_chip_find() - find a TPM chip and get a reference to it > >>+ */ > >>+struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_find(void) > >I feel like this should be called 'tpm_default_chip()' > > > >>+{ > >>+ struct tpm_chip *chip, *res = NULL; > >>+ int chip_num = 0; > >>+ int chip_prev; > >>+ > >>+ mutex_lock(&idr_lock); > >>+ > >>+ do { > >>+ chip_prev = chip_num; > >>+ chip = idr_get_next(&dev_nums_idr, &chip_num); > >>+ if (chip) { > >>+ get_device(&chip->dev); > >>+ res = chip; > >>+ break; > >>+ } > >>+ } while (chip_prev != chip_num); > >>+ > >>+ mutex_unlock(&idr_lock); > >And what was tpm_chip_find_get should just call this function.. > And then after that each time tpm_get_ops() ? It is best to keep the tpm_chip_find_get/tpm_put_ops for internal use as it also manages the kref lifetime of chip in a subtle way, it relies on the ops lock not the kref to keep the memory valid when it has a NULL parameter.. Something like this: struct tpm_chip *tpm_find_get_ops(struct tpm_chip *chip) { int rc; if (chip) { if (!tpm_try_get_ops(chip)) return NULL; return chip; } chip = tpm_default_chip(); rc = tpm_try_get_ops(chip)); put_device(&chip->dev); if (rc) return NULL; return chip; } Jason