Re: [USER] [PATCH 2/2] Add security.apparmor to the set of extended attributes used by EVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 4:42 PM Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 15:56 -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > The kernel is taking security.apparmor into account when validating EVM,
> > so evmctl should be doing the same.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The XATTR_NAME_APPARMOR is dependent on the version of
> "/usr/include/linux/xattr.h".  Without it defined, evmctl fails to
> build.

Hmm, true. Is it reasonable to just hardcode it rather than using the define?



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux