On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 18:15 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > On 05/30/2018 06:00 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 17:49 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > >> So the other choice is to only keep patches 1,2, 6, and 7, so leave most > >> of the integrity audit messages untouched. Then only create a different > >> format for the new AUDIT_INTEGRITY_POLICY_RULE (current 8/8) that shares > >> (for consistency reasons) the same format with the existing integrity > >> audit messages but also misses tty= and exe= ? > > Another option would be for the new AUDIT_INTEGRITY_POLICY_RULE to > > call audit_log_task_info() similar to what ima_audit_measurement() > > does. > > Right. [That would mean keep 1,2, 7 and modify 8.] Is that the best > solution? Yes, I think so. Calling audit_log_task_info() will only add the "exe=" and "tty=" to the new AUDIT_INTEGRITY_POLICY_RULE.
